On 8/27/2011 7:39 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
The next step needed is for someone to volunteer to write and champion
a PEP that:
Would it be feasible and desirable to modify regex so
that it *is* backwards-compatible with re, with a view
to making it a drop-in replacement at some point?
If not, the PEP should discuss this also.
Many of the things regex does differently might be called either bug
fixes or feature changes, depending on one's viewpoint. Regex should
definitely not be 'bug-compatible'.
I think regex should be unicode-standard compliant as much as possible,
and let the chips fall where they may. If so, it would be like the
decimal module, which closely tracks the IEEE decimal standard, rather
than the binary float standard. Regex is already much more compliant
than re, as shown by Tom Christiansen. This is pretty obviously
intentional on MB's part. It is also probably intentional that re *not*
match today's Unicode TR18 specifications.
These are reasons why both Ezio and I suggested on the tracker adding
regex without deleting re. (I personally would not mind just replacing
re with regex, but then I have no legacy re code to break. So I am not
suggesting that out of respect for those who do.)
--
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
