Le Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:37:48 -0400, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> a écrit :
> On 2.7, >>> license() return a text that includes a complete list of > releases from 1.6 to 2.7 and stops there > Release Derived Year Owner GPL- > from compatible? > (1) > > 0.9.0 thru 1.2 1991-1995 CWI yes > 1.3 thru 1.5.2 1.2 1995-1999 CNRI yes > 1.6 1.5.2 2000 CNRI no > 2.0 1.6 2000 BeOpen.com no > ... > 2.6.5 2.6.4 2010 PSF yes > 2.7 2.6 2010 PSF yes > > Was it intentional to stop with 2.7 and not continue with 2.7.1, etc? > > On 3.3.2, the 2.x list ends with 2.6.5 and never mentions 2.7. > Intentional? It then jumps back to 3.0 and ends with the 'previous' > release, 3.3.1. Should 3.3.2 be included in the 3.3.2 list? > > ... > 2.6.4 2.6.3 2009 PSF yes > 2.6.5 2.6.4 2010 PSF yes > 3.0 2.6 2008 PSF yes > 3.0.1 3.0 2009 PSF yes > ... > 3.2.4 3.2.3 2013 PSF yes > 3.3.0 3.2 2012 PSF yes > 3.3.1 3.3.0 2013 PSF yes I don't really understand why the releases should be manually listed. Is it some kind of defensive coding? Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
