OK. Let's do it.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 09/17/2013 05:37 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > > On 2.7, >>> license() return a text that includes a complete list of > > releases from 1.6 to 2.7 and stops there > > Release Derived Year Owner GPL- > > from compatible? (1) > > > > 0.9.0 thru 1.2 1991-1995 CWI yes > > 1.3 thru 1.5.2 1.2 1995-1999 CNRI yes > > 1.6 1.5.2 2000 CNRI no > > 2.0 1.6 2000 BeOpen.com no > > ... > > 2.6.5 2.6.4 2010 PSF yes > > 2.7 2.6 2010 PSF yes > > > > Was it intentional to stop with 2.7 and not continue with 2.7.1, etc? > > > > On 3.3.2, the 2.x list ends with 2.6.5 and never mentions 2.7. > Intentional? > > It then jumps back to 3.0 and ends with the 'previous' release, 3.3.1. > > Should 3.3.2 be included in the 3.3.2 list? > > > > ... > > 2.6.4 2.6.3 2009 PSF yes > > 2.6.5 2.6.4 2010 PSF yes > > 3.0 2.6 2008 PSF yes > > 3.0.1 3.0 2009 PSF yes > > ... > > 3.2.4 3.2.3 2013 PSF yes > > 3.3.0 3.2 2012 PSF yes > > 3.3.1 3.3.0 2013 PSF yes > > Since there are 3 versions of this table, it's unavoidable that one of them > gets out of sync :) > > * LICENSE > * Doc/license.rst > * the versions for each release on the website > > So I wholeheartedly support truncating before 2.2 (which is the first > release where all micro versions are PSF owned and GPL compatible) and > just saying "2.2 onwards" (or whatever is the best way to say it). > > cheers, > Georg > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
