On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:47:48 -0700 Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > > IIRC this table was added when a few core Python developers including > myself left CNRI in 2000. We had a bit of an argument about the license > (not too much though -- in the end things came out alright). Some lawyer at > CNRI thought it was a good idea to record a release history like this with > the license, as a defense against whatever claims of ownership to the code > someone else might suddenly come up with. Since all I wanted was to get out > of there while causing them minimal upset, I told them I'd comply. But > that's over 13 years ago now, and I'm not sure if it ever made sense (the > internet is a different place than CNRI's lawyers envisioned). Only the top > 10 of so lines of the table are in the least interesting (note that it > describes a graph). I propose that we truncate the table and add a note > saying that all following releases are owned by the PSF, GPL-compatible, > and derived from previous PSF-owned and GPL-compatible releases. That > should do until the PSF goes out of business (which I hope will never > happen -- this is one reason why I wish the conferences were run by a > separate entity, to avoid a conference bankruptcy from risking Python's > continued open-source status).
The PSF isn't technically the copyright holder, so would that pose a significant threat? (at worse the PSF could relicense Python based on the copyright agreements, but Python would still be distributable under the original license) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
