On 16 November 2016 at 10:27, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 November 2016 at 08:51, Mikhail V <mikhail...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What semantics it will fundamentally break or so hard to implement? > > I'm afraid I don't have time at the moment to fully review your email, > but my first impression is that you are proposing that the name "self" > be treated specially. It's going to be very difficult to convince > people that this is a good idea.
Oh Paul, come on, pleeeeease. I am making an **example**. Write a "poo" instead or a poo pile character, whatever. You think I am an idiot and don't know that there is "self" in OOP. When I was writing that I just thought, should I make a special note that I am making it only for example, but then thought, oh that would be too pedantic. You say you have no time and write a whole page about it, so don't blame me that I take too much time from you. Mikhail _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
