On 16 November 2016 at 16:48, Mikhail V <mikhail...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 November 2016 at 10:27, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 16 November 2016 at 08:51, Mikhail V <mikhail...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> What semantics it will fundamentally break or so hard to implement? >> >> I'm afraid I don't have time at the moment to fully review your email, >> but my first impression is that you are proposing that the name "self" >> be treated specially. It's going to be very difficult to convince >> people that this is a good idea. > > Oh Paul, come on, pleeeeease. > I am making an **example**. Write a "poo" instead or a poo pile character, > whatever. You think I am an idiot and don't know that there is "self" in OOP.
No I don't think you're an idiot. I thought you were offering a proposal. > When I was writing that I just thought, should I make a special note > that I am making it only for example, but then thought, oh that would > be too pedantic. Well, if it's "only an example", there's nothing to comment on. You need to offer a proper proposal with the details filled in - otherwise it's not worth replying. > You say you have no time and write a whole page about it, > so don't blame me that I take too much time from you. I'm sorry. I thought I was trying to help by explaining how your proposal could be improved. My mistake - I'll keep quiet next time. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
