On 16 November 2016 at 18:28, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > No I don't think you're an idiot. I thought you were offering a proposal. > >> When I was writing that I just thought, should I make a special note >> that I am making it only for example, but then thought, oh that would >> be too pedantic. > > Well, if it's "only an example", there's nothing to comment on. You > need to offer a proper proposal with the details filled in - otherwise > it's not worth replying. > >> You say you have no time and write a whole page about it, >> so don't blame me that I take too much time from you. > > I'm sorry. I thought I was trying to help by explaining how your > proposal could be improved. My mistake - I'll keep quiet next time.
Paul, ok, I apologize for the latter. But can you see, I spent also quite a bit of time trying to think out use cases, I spent over an hour and looked for similar ideas here. Then I accurately made the subject for the question "Technical possibilities" which already implies that it is about my previous misunderstanding of typed vs. non-typed execution and its possible consequences and it is hard to do without exact knowledge how it all works. Therefore I start small and wanted actually that next time I don't ask stupid questions and other new users can also raise their knowledge for making better quality post. My only fault is that I choose wrong name for the keyword and naively supposed that it will not cause big misunderstanding. Ok? So lets say I made a typo and lets take other keyword, it is not so important in this case, which one. Mikhail _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
