On Nov 16 2016, Mikhail V <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On 16 November 2016 at 10:27, Paul Moore
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 16 November 2016 at 08:51, Mikhail V
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> What semantics it will fundamentally break or so hard to implement?
>>
>> I'm afraid I don't have time at the moment to fully review your email,
>> but my first impression is that you are proposing that the name "self"
>> be treated specially. It's going to be very difficult to convince
>> people that this is a good idea.
>
> Oh Paul, come on, pleeeeease.
> I am making an **example**. Write a "poo" instead or a poo pile
> character,
...and all of Paul's points still apply.
> You think I am an idiot and don't know that there is "self" in OOP.
No, that wouldn't be the reason.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
