On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Gyro Funch <gyromagne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/4/2017 2:22 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Nick Coghlan > > <ncogh...@gmail.com > > <mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Perhaps typing could switch to being a bundled module, such that it > > had its own version, independent of the Python standard library > > version, but was still present by default in new installations? > > > > > > This is beginning to sound like the most attractive solution. We > > could possibly do away with typing_extensions. Are there precedents > > of how to bundle a module in this way? Or is it going to be another > > special case like pip? > > > > -- > > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido <http://python.org/~guido>) > > > > > Would this mean that other packages in the stdlib with development > cycles faster than those of python could use the same bundling > mechanism? > This is pretty much how I thought things worked for all built-in packages until this thread came up. Is there any reason to not do this for all of stdlib?
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
