On Thu, Jan 2, 2020, at 13:22, Dan Sommers wrote: > What about "if except" (any time I can eliminate a "not," that's a good > thing):
wait, is this meant to be for the doesn't-throw case or does-throw? how are we eliminating the not? > if except x: > y > > which could even leave room to specify which exception(s) is/are caught: > > if except ValueError: x: > y > > except that the two colons on one line look a little odd in Python. if x except ValueError? _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/JQR372PJSL3K6FJKTNEHHG35YAD3K7VF/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
