On 1/2/20 3:07 PM, Random832 wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020, at 13:22, Dan Sommers wrote:
>> What about "if except" (any time I can eliminate a "not," that's a >> good thing): > > ... is this meant to be for the doesn't-throw case or does-throw? ... >> >> if except x: >> y That would be the does-throw case. Read it as "if there's an exception evaluating x, then do the following." > ... how are we eliminating the not? I changed "not try" to "except," thus eliminating the "not." >> which could even leave room to specify which exception(s) is/are caught: >> >> if except ValueError: x: >> y >> >> except that the two colons on one line look a little odd in Python. > > if x except ValueError? _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/WIY5NM5PG2TULDAYBGI6BGT4PMGW7TGC/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
