On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 at 16:36, Christopher Barker <python...@gmail.com> wrote: > > However, the amount of time the two of us have spent on this thread could > have been used to review the status of quite a few packages :-) > >> >> Indeed. But I expect it'd be easier to get one person to write one >> blog post about their favourite packages than to create some sort of >> comprehensive list of everything that's good :) > > > of course it would, but then you'd only know about a few packages -- not a > great comparison. >
And reviewing those few packages would be just as minimal as anything else, because neither of us has any sort of comprehensive knowledge of packages :) But maybe it'd be a start. > However, that's why I like the idea of a centralized package review site -- > then you get that one person to write one review of the PCRE packages and > post a PR. Then a couple hundred such people and you've got something! But > critical mass would be hard to get. > Every review (where a "review" might cover multiple packages) would have to have a date on it, so people know how useful the information is likely to be. Which means your centralized review site is really just a link to a bunch of separate things anyway. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/QG7LVCJFATEA7K2TEBCURA4T2OEAGCXX/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
