On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > >> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > >>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>>> <snip> > >> I think the first level of organization should be by application > >>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use > >>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained > units > >>>> that people could volunteer to execute. > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> Keith > >>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc. > -- > >>> sounds ideal. > >>> > >>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification? > >> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder > >> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them > >> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would either > >> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you are > >> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory structure on > >> the TestLink site and match the test numbers. > > That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have done > > this as well. :( > > I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current > > personal schedule. > > > > Would it be possible for you to set up an area under -- > > https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/ > > > > and just use your structure so we can take a look? > Kay; > I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure was > somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of > the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different > type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at all. > The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed mostly to be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the time which is why I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on TestLInk. > > I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy > with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week. > Sounds good! > > Regards > Keith > > > >> I believe that a deeper level of granularity is needed that just the > >> application. > >> > >> Regards > >> Keith > >> <snip> > >> > >> > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Less is MORE."
