Keith, short update -- see below On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> On 6/8/2018 12:54 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> > On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> >> On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna < >> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>>>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> >>>>>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>>>>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>>>>>>> <snip> >> >>>>>> I think the first level of organization should be by application >> >>>>>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want >> to use >> >>>>>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained >> >>>> units >> >>>>>>>> that people could volunteer to execute. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Regards >> >>>>>>>> Keith >> >>>>>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, >> etc. >> >>>> -- >> >>>>>>> sounds ideal. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification? >> >>>>>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder >> >>>>>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit >> them >> >>>>>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would >> either >> >>>>>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you >> are >> >>>>>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory >> structure on >> >>>>>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers. >> >>>>> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have >> done >> >>>>> this as well. :( >> >>>>> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my >> current >> >>>>> personal schedule. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under -- >> >>>>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> and just use your structure so we can take a look? >> >>>> Kay; >> >>>> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure >> was >> >>>> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of >> >>>> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different >> >>>> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at >> all. >> >>>> >> >>> The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed >> mostly to >> >>> be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the >> time >> >>> which is why >> >>> >> >>> I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on >> >>> TestLInk. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy >> >>>> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week. >> >>>> >> >>> Sounds good! >> >> Kay; I committed the Directory Structure I used for impress files to >> the >> >> ManualTest directory. It appeared to build but they do not show on the >> >> production website. Is there something else I should have changed? >> >> >> >> Sorry for taking so long, but with medical issues with my girlfriend >> and >> >> some personal issues of my own the last month has been hectic. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Keith >> > Hi Keith -- >> > No worries. I'll take a look. Did you "publish" your changes after >> > committing? >> No was not aware of that step or how to do it. I rarely use my committer >> privileges as I am not a coder in any way shape or form. I used to use >> the cms to make minor changes to the aoo site but that no longer appears >> to work. If you do not mind giving me a quick rundown on how I will be >> glad to do that in the future. >> > > > Typically, the sequence of events for changes to the web server is to: > * commit your changes, > * review on the staging server (ooo-site staging > <http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/>), > * then publish to the production server if all is well. > > I use the "Easy Publish" facility from https://cms.apache.org/. > Once you supply your ASF credentials, navigate to ooo-site, and just click > "Publish ooo-site". > > For now, I deleted the old index.html. I will need to modify the script to > accommodate directory structures rather just a list of files. So, hopefully > by mid-week, we will have the Impress items "show up". Thank you again for > all your work. > This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file needs to be regenerated. > > >> >> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never >> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add >> it to my keyring. >> > > Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when > I respond to a "signed" message like yours. > > > >> >> Regards >> Keith >> > If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation >> > script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime. >> > Thanks so much for your work on this, >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > MzK > > "Less is MORE." > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Less is MORE."