On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna <keith.mcke...@comcast.net > wrote:
> On 6/8/2018 12:54 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > >> On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>>>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > >>>>>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>>>>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>>>>>>> <snip> > >>>>>> I think the first level of organization should be by application > >>>>>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to > use > >>>>>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained > >>>> units > >>>>>>>> that people could volunteer to execute. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>> Keith > >>>>>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, > etc. > >>>> -- > >>>>>>> sounds ideal. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification? > >>>>>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder > >>>>>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them > >>>>>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would > either > >>>>>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you > are > >>>>>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory > structure on > >>>>>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers. > >>>>> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have > done > >>>>> this as well. :( > >>>>> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current > >>>>> personal schedule. > >>>>> > >>>>> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under -- > >>>>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/ > >>>>> > >>>>> and just use your structure so we can take a look? > >>>> Kay; > >>>> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure was > >>>> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of > >>>> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different > >>>> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at > all. > >>>> > >>> The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed > mostly to > >>> be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the > time > >>> which is why > >>> > >>> I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on > >>> TestLInk. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy > >>>> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week. > >>>> > >>> Sounds good! > >> Kay; I committed the Directory Structure I used for impress files to the > >> ManualTest directory. It appeared to build but they do not show on the > >> production website. Is there something else I should have changed? > >> > >> Sorry for taking so long, but with medical issues with my girlfriend and > >> some personal issues of my own the last month has been hectic. > >> > >> Regards > >> Keith > > Hi Keith -- > > No worries. I'll take a look. Did you "publish" your changes after > > committing? > No was not aware of that step or how to do it. I rarely use my committer > privileges as I am not a coder in any way shape or form. I used to use > the cms to make minor changes to the aoo site but that no longer appears > to work. If you do not mind giving me a quick rundown on how I will be > glad to do that in the future. > Typically, the sequence of events for changes to the web server is to: * commit your changes, * review on the staging server (ooo-site staging <http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/>), * then publish to the production server if all is well. I use the "Easy Publish" facility from https://cms.apache.org/. Once you supply your ASF credentials, navigate to ooo-site, and just click "Publish ooo-site". For now, I deleted the old index.html. I will need to modify the script to accommodate directory structures rather just a list of files. So, hopefully by mid-week, we will have the Impress items "show up". Thank you again for all your work. > > BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never > been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add > it to my keyring. > Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when I respond to a "signed" message like yours. > > Regards > Keith > > If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation > > script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime. > > Thanks so much for your work on this, > > > >> > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Less is MORE."
