On 18/05/26, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 4:02 AM Anton Johansson via qemu development
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is a first patchset moving towards single-binary support for riscv.
> > Additional patchsets for hw/ and target/ are based on this one so it's
> > best to make sure the approach taken is ok.  Most patches in this set
> > concern fields in CPUArchState which are either widened (usually to
> > uint64_t) or fixed to a smaller size which handles all use cases.
> >
> > General purpose registers and fields mapped to TCG are dealt with by
> > widening the type and applying an offset to tcg_global_mem_new() to
> > correctly handle 32-bit targets on big endian hosts.
> >
> > Quick question to correct my understanding. AFAICT riscv64-softmmu is a
> > superset of riscv32-softmmu which handles 32-, 64, and 128-bit ISAs, so
> > concerning single-binary do we for the time being only need to support
> > riscv64-softmmu?
> 
> That's mostly right.
> 
> In an ideal world there would be no riscv32-softmmu, just a
> riscv64-softmmu which could handle all bit lengths.
> 
> There are currently corner cases where riscv64-softmmu doesn't work as
> well for 32-bit bit (I heard GDB debugging a 32-bit guest either
> doesn't work or has problems).
> 
> But focusing on riscv64-softmmu with the goal of dropping
> riscv32-softmmu in the future is fine with me
> 
> Alistair

Thanks for the clarification! Do you know if there's any performance
regression to running 32-bit code under riscv64-softmmu? I assume
there's more extensions/truncations?

-- 
Anton Johansson
rev.ng Labs Srl.

Reply via email to