On 25 January 2013 12:49, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 25.01.2013 11:43, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> ...so why is a big code movement patch 1.4 material? >> I would prefer us to wait for 1.5, and then we have a >> reasonable chance of saying "release goal for 1.5 is to >> have moved all the arch-specific hw files to their new homes". >> If we commit this for 1.4 then at 1.4 release the source tree >> will be in an odd halfway statet. > > You so far refused to have new SoCs/devices put in hw/arm/. Doing so > does keep consistency but creates more work moving them later.
I haven't *refused*. I just haven't seen a consensus about what we want the filesystem layout to be, in the absence of which I haven't seen any great reason to change from the current setup. If we have that consensus then fine, we can move things around. -- PMM
