On 25 January 2013 13:37, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: > On 25.01.2013, at 14:33, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 25 January 2013 12:49, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >>> Am 25.01.2013 11:43, schrieb Peter Maydell: >>> You so far refused to have new SoCs/devices put in hw/arm/. Doing so >>> does keep consistency but creates more work moving them later. >> >> I haven't *refused*. I just haven't seen a consensus about what >> we want the filesystem layout to be, in the absence of which I >> haven't seen any great reason to change from the current setup. >> If we have that consensus then fine, we can move things around. > > I don't care which way we go (everything in hw/ or split into > subdirs), but the current state where some logically depending > pieces are in hw/ and others are in hw/foo just plain sucks. > > Since you don't have that problem, you can just ignore this patch > for arm. It's really a cleanup for me so that I stay sane :).
Well, I do care, because we should be aiming for some consistency across architectures, whether we do that by moving more files into hw/$arch/ or by moving the handful of files and random Makefile.objs out of hw/$arch/... If we have some consensus on moving things into hw/$arch that's fine and we can move the arm stuff in 1.5 sometime I guess. -- PMM
