On 25.01.2013, at 14:33, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 25 January 2013 12:49, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> Am 25.01.2013 11:43, schrieb Peter Maydell: >>> ...so why is a big code movement patch 1.4 material? >>> I would prefer us to wait for 1.5, and then we have a >>> reasonable chance of saying "release goal for 1.5 is to >>> have moved all the arch-specific hw files to their new homes". >>> If we commit this for 1.4 then at 1.4 release the source tree >>> will be in an odd halfway statet. >> >> You so far refused to have new SoCs/devices put in hw/arm/. Doing so >> does keep consistency but creates more work moving them later. > > I haven't *refused*. I just haven't seen a consensus about what > we want the filesystem layout to be, in the absence of which I > haven't seen any great reason to change from the current setup. > If we have that consensus then fine, we can move things around.
I don't care which way we go (everything in hw/ or split into subdirs), but the current state where some logically depending pieces are in hw/ and others are in hw/foojust plain sucks. Since you don't have that problem, you can just ignore this patch for arm. It's really a cleanup for me so that I stay sane :). Alex