On 25.01.2013, at 14:40, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 25 January 2013 13:37, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: >> On 25.01.2013, at 14:33, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On 25 January 2013 12:49, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >>>> Am 25.01.2013 11:43, schrieb Peter Maydell: >>>> You so far refused to have new SoCs/devices put in hw/arm/. Doing so >>>> does keep consistency but creates more work moving them later. >>> >>> I haven't *refused*. I just haven't seen a consensus about what >>> we want the filesystem layout to be, in the absence of which I >>> haven't seen any great reason to change from the current setup. >>> If we have that consensus then fine, we can move things around. >> >> I don't care which way we go (everything in hw/ or split into >> subdirs), but the current state where some logically depending >> pieces are in hw/ and others are in hw/foo just plain sucks. >> >> Since you don't have that problem, you can just ignore this patch >> for arm. It's really a cleanup for me so that I stay sane :). > > Well, I do care, because we should be aiming for some consistency > across architectures, whether we do that by moving more files > into hw/$arch/ or by moving the handful of files and random > Makefile.objs out of hw/$arch/...
Sure, how do we reach that consensus? Call in the quorum of the 13 tribes? :) Alex
