Il 17/07/2013 12:23, Peter Lieven ha scritto: > > Am 16.07.2013 um 13:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>: > >> Il 16/07/2013 13:40, Peter Lieven ha scritto: >>> >>> The conflict with your block status patches can't be large. >>> upstream/master has no >>> iscsi_co_is_allocated yet, so there should be no trouble. >> >> Yes, whoever goes second has to change it to the new get_block_status >> API. Kevin and Stefan can decide who that lucky guy is. > > Wouldn't you be able to merge it into scsi/next ?
get_block_status is not work for the SCSI tree. If you mean making it easier for you to rebase on top, the v2 I posted yesterday is in branch block-flags in my github repo. Paolo
