Am 17.07.2013 um 16:26 schrieb Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>: > Il 17/07/2013 16:18, Peter Lieven ha scritto: >>>>>> That would be ok if the patches are merged first. Otherwise I could ask >>>>>> Kevin >>>>>> to merge my old series (except the iscsi_co_write_zeroes patch as there >>>>>> obviously is still room for discussion and improvement) and you could >>>>>> tweak >>>>>> iscsi_co_is_allocated later? >>>> >>>> I'll look at your old series, I think the conflicts are relatively >>>> trivial. But I think that this series must wait for 1.7. >> Would it be an Option to merge it except for the iscsi_co_is_allocated and >> the iscsi_co_write_zeroes patch. 3 of the Patches fix potential bugs. > > Yes, of course! And I think I can merge them via scsi/next, too. What > patches are you thinking of exactly? Can you write the numbers?
Mandatory: [PATCHv3 07/10] iscsi: fix -ENOSPC in iscsi_create() [PATCHv3 08/10] iscsi: factor out sector conversions [PATCHv3 09/10] iscsi: remove support for misaligned nb_sectors in aio_readv [PATCHv3 10/10] iscsi: assert that sectors are aligned to LUN blocksize Optional (non-conflicting patches): [PATCHv3 01/10] iscsi: add logical block provisioning information to iscsilun [PATCHv3 05/10] block: add bdrv_write_zeroes() [PATCHv3 06/10] block/raw: add bdrv_co_write_zeroes If you want you can also already merge this and just rename it to iscsi_co_get_block_status. This would enable your qemu-img map command to also work for iscsi. [PATCHv3 02/10] iscsi: add .bdrv_co_is_allocated Thank you, Peter
