On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:51:07AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > On 02/05/2016 09:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > > > >>On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:55:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>On 04/02/2016 12:41, Andreas Färber wrote: > >>>>You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marcel > >>>>who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it. > >>> > >>>Yes. > >>> > >>>>For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM > >>>>migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up > >>>>you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so that > >>>>at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring > >>>>discussion? > >>> > >>>I might have changed my mind on that. You definitely should be M: for > >>>qdev. > >>> > >>>Paolo > >> > >>If Andreas wants to, that's also fine. Several maintainers are > >>better than one. > > > >*If* the maintainers are all willing and able to work together. > > > > No problem here from my point of view :)
No problem to me, too. :) I am going to be away from work for 15 days starting on Tuesday Feb 16th. So if Marcel wants to start queueing patches already, please be my guest. I will be able to help on that after I'm back. -- Eduardo
