"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:55:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 04/02/2016 12:41, Andreas Färber wrote: >> > You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marcel >> > who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it. >> >> Yes. >> >> > For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM >> > migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up >> > you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so that >> > at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring >> > discussion? >> >> I might have changed my mind on that. You definitely should be M: for qdev. >> >> Paolo > > If Andreas wants to, that's also fine. Several maintainers are > better than one.
*If* the maintainers are all willing and able to work together.
