On 02/11/2016 09:41 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:51:07AM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 02/05/2016 09:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:55:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 04/02/2016 12:41, Andreas Färber wrote:
You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marcel
who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it.
Yes.
For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM
migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up
you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so that
at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring
discussion?
I might have changed my mind on that. You definitely should be M: for qdev.
Paolo
If Andreas wants to, that's also fine. Several maintainers are
better than one.
*If* the maintainers are all willing and able to work together.
No problem here from my point of view :)
No problem to me, too. :)
I am going to be away from work for 15 days starting on Tuesday
Feb 16th. So if Marcel wants to start queueing patches already,
please be my guest. I will be able to help on that after I'm
back.
Hi,
If there are only a few patches on the mailing list, they can wait.
If the number will grow I'll send a pull request.
So the MAINTAINER file should look like this, right?
Regarding qdev, Andreas, I also think you are the most qualified
to take it, will you?
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 2d6ee17..a86491a 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1200,6 +1200,13 @@ F: docs/*qmp-*
F: scripts/qmp/
T: git git://repo.or.cz/qemu/armbru.git qapi-next
+Machine
+M: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
+M: Marcel Apfelbaum <mar...@redhat.com>
+S: Supported
+F: hw/core/machine.c
+F: include/hw/boards.h
+
Thanks,
Marcel
