On 02/05/2016 09:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:55:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 04/02/2016 12:41, Andreas Färber wrote:
You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marcel
who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it.
Yes.
For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM
migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up
you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so that
at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring
discussion?
I might have changed my mind on that. You definitely should be M: for qdev.
Paolo
If Andreas wants to, that's also fine. Several maintainers are
better than one.
*If* the maintainers are all willing and able to work together.
No problem here from my point of view :)
Thanks,
Marcel
