On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:56 PM, malc <av1...@comtv.ru> wrote: > > While intentions of this are good, i believe this goes too far, i doubt > that the proposed additions are enforcable and have no doubts that they > will be widely ignored and at the same time provide more grounds for > whining. Furthermore the existing code doesn't follow them, going out on > a limb, it's more likely that one would look around the code he/she > modifies and base his/her modifications on the surrounding code than to > follow the style that conflicts with it.
The existing code that I have touched don't follow the current coding style guidance, much less all the new recommendations being suggested. Although, I do believe that this situation needs to change. If we agree in a coding style, I would volunteer to be a some kind of observer to fix and alert people about coding styles mistakes. Regards, Miguel
