On 08/17/10 15:21, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 08/17/2010 03:04 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> On 08/13/10 20:02, Blue Swirl wrote: >>> I fully agree on the need of change and support your excellent idea. >>> There are other ways to solve the problem, but I believe we need more >>> order than more chaos. Perhaps we the QEMU developers should appoint >>> you the Guardian of the CODING_STYLE, and add a rule that no patch >>> shall be committed without your CS-Acked-by line? >>> >> I don't think this would ever work, it is begging for trouble relying on >> one person to review all patches for this. >> >> While I agree coding style is good since it enforces consistency, there >> are plenty problems with the old rules > > To be perfectly honest, we have enough hard problems to solve in QEMU. > We're spending a lot more time on coding style than we probably need to :-)
I think we are in full agreement here, I am really just worried that we add additional procedures here that will slow down the real development. Cheers, Jes
