On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Jes Sorensen <jes.soren...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 08/17/10 15:21, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 08/17/2010 03:04 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >>> On 08/13/10 20:02, Blue Swirl wrote: >>>> I fully agree on the need of change and support your excellent idea. >>>> There are other ways to solve the problem, but I believe we need more >>>> order than more chaos. Perhaps we the QEMU developers should appoint >>>> you the Guardian of the CODING_STYLE, and add a rule that no patch >>>> shall be committed without your CS-Acked-by line? >>>> >>> I don't think this would ever work, it is begging for trouble relying on >>> one person to review all patches for this. >>> >>> While I agree coding style is good since it enforces consistency, there >>> are plenty problems with the old rules >> >> To be perfectly honest, we have enough hard problems to solve in QEMU. >> We're spending a lot more time on coding style than we probably need to :-) > > I think we are in full agreement here, I am really just worried that we > add additional procedures here that will slow down the real development.
Either the braces rule in CODING_STYLE is downgraded to recommendation, or some kind of new order is introduced. Current situation is unfair.