On 10/01/2016 05:05 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
+                uint64_t size = 1024ULL * (8 << 3 * TTE_PGSIZE(tlb[i].tte));

Your previous expression, 8192 << 3 * TTE_PGSIZE is clearer. Perhaps this itself should be extracted as a macro?

+                if ((new_vaddr == vaddr) || ((new_vaddr < (vaddr + size))
+                    && (vaddr < (new_vaddr + new_size)))) {

Please drop the unnecessary parenthesis and line up the expressions properly,

  if (new_vaddr == vaddr
      || (new_vaddr < vaddr + size
          && vaddr < new_vaddr + new_size)) {

so that one can tell at a glance how the subexpressions are nested.


r~

Reply via email to