On 2 January 2011 10:31, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 11:46:16PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Can it be applied please? (cc'd Aurelien since you seem to be >> committing various missed patches at the moment :-)) > > Sorry, I understood there was a conflict with another patch series, and > it was better to wait. Committed now.
Thanks. > As a side note, there are now a few places where the following code is > present: > > float32_is_quiet_nan(x) || float32_is_signaling_nan(x) > > It might be a good idea to add back a function float32_is_nan() that > this time checks for both quiet and signaling NaN. This is already present as float32_is_any_nan() (I added it as part of one of the earlier ARM patchsets). -- PMM
