On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:12:32AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 2 January 2011 10:31, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 11:46:16PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> Can it be applied please? (cc'd Aurelien since you seem to be > >> committing various missed patches at the moment :-)) > > > > Sorry, I understood there was a conflict with another patch series, and > > it was better to wait. Committed now. > > Thanks. > > > As a side note, there are now a few places where the following code is > > present: > > > > float32_is_quiet_nan(x) || float32_is_signaling_nan(x) > > > > It might be a good idea to add back a function float32_is_nan() that > > this time checks for both quiet and signaling NaN. > > This is already present as float32_is_any_nan() (I added it as > part of one of the earlier ARM patchsets). >
Ok, then I am going to produce a cleanup patch to use it. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
