On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 06:42, Tim Sutton <t...@kartoza.com> wrote: > > GitHub impact is more conceptual than actual as has been shown in this > thread. So sure, lets have a plan B in place, that was always the long game > plan for our code etc. But lets do take our time and do it right and in a > considered way. We reached agreement in A Coruna to use GitHub for issue > tracking and I don’t think it is constructive to turn around a few months > later and try to roll back on what has been years of painful and protracted > community negotiations and planning to get to where we are now. IMHO moving > to GitHub issues has been a great improvement for the project - and thanks > again especially to Jorge and friends who did all the heavy lifting!
I agree. But I think what Sandro was proposing was just a read-only mirror of the issues on gitea. Which I'd be totally in favor of. Nyall _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
