Hi Richard, Sorry if it was a bit a rough start! The stale bot specifically picks only issues which are left with the "feedback" label. This was the case with these two issues. I notice Giovanni already fixed this.
The assumption is that the veggies don't have open questions on them and this way we can filter the weed. Does that sound reasonable to you? Best regards Matthias On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 9:38 AM Richard Duivenvoorde <rdmaili...@duif.net> wrote: > I received some "this issue will be closed because of lack of feedback", > but I think current 'stale bot implementation' is a little rude on the > edges. > > (did I miss some discussion about this here?) > > I received some "this issue will be closed because of lack of feedback", > only because I commented on them. But some are just plain valid: > > As an example: > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/39107#issuecomment-749298135 > that is just a valid use-case (or maybe feature request?) > > This one: > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/37984 > is just valid (I even installed Oracle to check this...) > > This one: also valid and still needed: > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/37956 > > Weeding the issues is not nice, so removing non-valid, old or non > responding is fine, but now I think the bot is pulling the veggies instead > of the weed :-) > > Regards, > > Richard Duivenvoorde > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
