I run the latest 3.4.x on Linux which has been very stable and reliable.

It will be a while before 3.x is as mature and dependable as 2.x which was at 2.18 a very mature product that had been operating a good number of years.

Used to run the development version 2.99 but these days I view "stable" as effectively development simply because other users (not me) have lodged reports for hundreds of bugs that are progressing only slowly.

I wanted the new features in 3.x and would not go back to 2.18 now.

On 11/12/18 6:49 AM, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote:
Hi,

I can't contribute to your particular problems, but have some remarks.

You said you "reverted" to 2.18. On Windows, you can easily run 3.x besides 2.x. Do you have the same problems with 2.18?  If so, it's really your personal installation that fails, I think.

The node tool was redesigned in 3.x, and there is quite a discussion going on, cause not so many people like the new behaviour.

In general, I would like to say, that the promotion of the newest release shown in QGIS is quite a bad idea: The inexperienced will not hesitate to update and therefore run in every possible bug, being left clueless, while the more experienced are more cautious and install it only anlongside for testing purposes first.

The developers are in a bad situation: They need lots of testers to find bugs, but in my opinion they reach the wrong users with that advertisement. (no idea how to improve this)

Furthermore, the new version had a bad start, cause (as I understood) last-minute-changes in dependencies caught them unprepared.

Unfortunately, no one gives warnings about the major issues somewhere prominently e.g. on the QGIS.org website, so you have to read the mailing-list(s) and search in the issue queue yourself. In my opinion, in QGIS3 the developers were a little too ambitious, but it seems they also had kind of bad luck as well. Lots of features introduced are somewhat bleeding-edge and need time to ripe.

As I rarely use Windows, I'm not of big help. I just want to recommend you to use the network installer (advanced install!) and install the 2.x LTR and the 3.x LTR in parallel and update them through the installer once in a while, and keep 2.18 for productive work as long as you do not trust the 3.x version.

The open source mantra is "release early, release often", but that doesn't mean that everyone has to update early and often as well!

_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to