Wolfgang Lenerz writes: > > Doesnt this defeat the object? We already can do this with a simple > > Config block. The point of a Homedir is that you can always know > > the name and path of the current job from wherever it is executed. > > I think we were talking about jobs executed from things which don't have a > filename. > Weren't we?
Sorry if I misunderstood. Executable Things that were set up using HOT_RES and family would have access to the filename, and every instance of of the Thing that was executed via EXEP could inherit that filename. > > (BTW, by supplying the name too, it would allow the program to poke its > > own binary on disk, eg for configuration purposes). > > OK, sure. > I think Marcel said something similar, too- the dir name and the total > name of the file. Yes, theres no point in not doing so. Per _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
