George writes: > > stack (a7) > > channel count > > channels > > command string > > > > magic (.w) <- (a6,a5) (as at present) > > program's name length (.w) > > HD's length (.w) > > program's name bytes > > padding of above to 42 bytes > > > > > > Since there is nothing on the stack after the end of the parameter string, > (A6,A5) can be said to point either to the end of the parameter string or to the > bottom of the stack. I have alwys treated (A6,A5) as pointing to the bottom > of the stack and this seems more logical to me than to say that it points to > the end of the parameter string. I would then think it better to find the new > information by looking to the end of the parameter string. After all, you can't > use (A6,A5) to get to the parameter string itself, you have to look to the end > of the channel info.
I see your point and agree. It shouldnt affect compatibility except possibly in the case of QLib, who's workings we dont know. Per _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
