But _nobody_ will take the time to write malware for QL platform! Doug L. 37830 USA
That's precisely why I want to move as much of my daily business as possible back to the QL in some form. I am learning more about 'Net-QL possibilities in this exchange than otherwise, in a long time. Thanks. -----Original Message----- >From: Malcolm Cadman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Sep 12, 2006 2:22 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [ql-users] Tandata Modem Q Con + Q Mod > >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Neil Riley ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > <...snip...> >Other people may correct me, yet I believe that the aim was to get a >high end black box system to be able to do it - QL + Gold Card / Super >Gold Card + Disk drives + upgraded serial SuperHermes + a 28K or 56K >modem. Supported by QL oftware, yet not necessarily needing a hard >drive. Not sure if SMSQ required rather than QDOS. > >This sort of specification would meet with a lot of equipment still in >use. > >At the same time, though, PC's became cheaper and better specified so >that a QL system would be the more expensive to set up for use. > >-- >Malcolm Cadman >_______________________________________________ >QL-Users Mailing List >http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
