gdgqler wrote: > Yes, the Q60 is a good machine. One thing it has that QPC2 does not > is the Floating Point Unit. Simon Goodwin wrote some software using > this unit to replace the SMSQ/E trig functions. I think these > routines come with the Q60 software.
QPC replaces the SMSQ/E trig (and other) functions with x86 floating point code, so that's even faster ;) But apart from that QPC2 is lacking native FPU support, yes. I think the biggest drawback of the Qx0 is the weird display resolution which, as mentioned on the list recently, doesn't seem to be suitable for LCD monitors. Perhaps a 1024x768 mode could be tweaked out of the FPGA code, I don't know, but out of the box 1024x512 is bit problematic. Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
