gdgqler wrote: > I cannot see a need for it. It is nice to know that it is > intentionally not used in SMSQ/E. However, the message that is given > if you do try it is "faulty parameter", which is slightly confusing.
Ah, I see. "Not implemented" would make much more sense, yes. But nobody has touched it since Tony did it this way in 1999 or so... Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
