On 19 Feb 2010, at 15:33, Marcel Kilgus wrote: > gdgqler wrote: >> I cannot see a need for it. It is nice to know that it is >> intentionally not used in SMSQ/E. However, the message that is given >> if you do try it is "faulty parameter", which is slightly confusing. > > Ah, I see. "Not implemented" would make much more sense, yes. But > nobody has touched it since Tony did it this way in 1999 or so...
The reason this came up is that someone now trying to use this trap asked me why he could not get it to work. George _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
