On 27/11/10 17:53, Tobias Fröschle wrote: >> Puts() needs #include<stdio.h> or at least defining correctly! > It should, for the sake of art, but doesn't need to. Hmm. Not declaring a function, even one returning int (the default return type) is listed in my book of common C mistakes.
>> Main() always returns int. >> Main always takes two parameters int and char **. > It should, to generate anything maintainable, but doesn't need to. C > allows you to ignore return values. I know it allows me to do so, but just because I can do something doesn't mean that I should! ;-) Seriously, I agree. But the fact that main() is not returning a value is not the same as ignoring one, because it's the OS that should get the return from main() not some other part of the C program itself - which happily lets you, as you say, ignore return values. > I can do even better (alas, not on the QL - And: I'll probably never get > employment as a Java programmer): Neither will I I'm afraid, I loathe and detest Java with a vengeance! Too many problems at work caused by too many [bloody] java programmers (I use the term loosely) who reinvent the bloody wheel in java every single program they ever write. Sometimes I despair! I wonder how the fizzbuzz program would be written using quantum computing - which knows all the answers before you even ask the question! Cheers, Norman. -- Norman Dunbar Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd Registered address: Thorpe House 61 Richardshaw Lane Pudsey West Yorkshire United Kingdom LS28 7EL Company Number: 05132767 _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
