Wolfgang wrote: >> I wasn't talking about what QPC *could* do if it was *changed*. You called >> QPC a platform all by itself, and I think it is not. Because IIRC the only >> thing that can be run are <=68008 coded SMSQ/E applications. > >Right, then QL, then, isn't a platform, either, because all it can run >are "<=68008 coded QDOS applications". Of course the QL is a platform. It is not true that the QL is restricted to QDOS. I can run a different operating system on it, not only QDOS. The interfaces to the hardware are defined and accessible. That the old original QL is no longer a very interesting platform for a new OS is a different story. Remember I did never say QPC II must or should become a platform all by itself. I just said it isn't. The Q40 is. Peter
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Bill Waugh
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Bill Waugh
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Urs König
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Malcolm Cadman
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Fox
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf