Re: RE: [ql-users] One box or two

[Dave P]

On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Phoebus wrote:

> Of course it is relevant! It is always relevant... What's not relevant
> is to pay an arm and a leg to buy overhead (That's essentially what
> Windows is... added overhead... why do you think I still
> use Windows NT 4?

What makes the QL not relevant is that people are WILLIGN to pay an arm
and a leg to get something that will use up the resources of a 3GHz
machine. Scary!

800MHz coming, eh? Anyone up for writing DVD/video s/w for SMSQ? :o)

Dave