----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:33 PM Subject: Re: RE: [ql-users] One box or two
> > > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Phoebus wrote: > > > Of course it is relevant! It is always relevant... What's not relevant > > is to pay an arm and a leg to buy overhead (That's essentially what > > Windows is... added overhead... why do you think I still > > use Windows NT 4? > > What makes the QL not relevant is that people are WILLIGN to pay an arm > and a leg to get something that will use up the resources of a 3GHz > machine. Scary! Would run a damn fast spell checker though Dave (;-) All the best - Bill ( yeah I know - I can talk)
