??? 27/11/2002 3:59:38 ??, ?/? "Wolfgang Lenerz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??????:
<Absurdly complicated stuff about W DEFs snipped ;-) > > >A better way would be a menu designer for QPTR, of course... >Would also make it easier for Assembler programmers > >(...) >> * I hope all this makes sense ;) > >It does to me. > Well THERE'S GOT TO BE an easier way... ie an easier Interface for PE programs.... Right now the whole process looks so much like Visual Basic Window Definitions it's not even funny. I think the problem lies in trying to make a procedural language (SBasic) to work like a oO one..... I looked into Jerôme's C68 PE articles and I got SCARED! Timothy Swenson's article on the same thing made the whole lot look a lot more easier but that didn't change the fact that the whole process is complicated in itself! In any way, I was thinking about what Wolfgang said too. A QPTR menu designer along the lines of EasyPTR would be great (It would be greater if it were free too :-). What would be even better is to create a good all-round IDE w/GUI designer that would remove all the menial work from the programmer completely. Yes like EasyPTR but adding up something like the Linker, a Basic compiler (Turbo seems great for the job ;-) a tool like MasterBasic an editor and a debugger all rolled into one. Hmm I'll look into it when I get some more time in my hands (after finals in two weeks). Phoebus
