Well that is more or less what I suggested under c) The question itself can't be avoided. At this point only the user can tell if the database should link and maybe update the item or add a clone.
As QMS internally calculates a hash for each revision of the item it is possible to detect if an item has been changed. However it is impossible to tell what is different. And as items are very complex it is hard to show a meaningful side-by-side compare. So it's still up to the user to understand the problem and to choose the appropriate way to add that item. Probably the most difficult choice is the selection if an item with differences and with several links in the database should be updated or not. Anyway it's quite some work for a very rare case in my usage. So my motivation to spend the time is low. Am Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2015, 15:59:59 schrieb [email protected]: > Hello everybody, > > On the same topic : > > I would like to prepare an hiking tour, put it in my "Hiking" folder and > also put it in my "2015" folder. > I tried the following steps : > > - create a database > - create a green Project folder "Hiking" > - load this folder to the workspace > - create a trace and save it as "tour1" in Hiking folder > - create a green Project folder "2015" > - load this folder to the workspace > - copy tour1 trace from Hiking folder to 2105 folder (this copies only a > link to tour1) > - close (and save) Hiking folder > - close (and save) 2015 folder > Now comes the popup :"do you want to replace the existing element or to > keep it ?" > > Is it possible that I get this question because QMS sees an identical ID > and does not check that, in fact, both tracks are the same ? > Could it be possible to avoid this question as QMS could check if both > tracks are identical ? > > Thanks for your help > > Le 02.10.2015 19:34, rainerU a écrit : > > Am 02.10.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Oliver Eichler: > >> But wouldn't that be answering a dialog every single time I want to > >> copy an item? I would consider this as very annoying. > > > > My proposal was not to add dialogs but to have the clone function on all > > existing "copy item" dialogs. > > > > I will not further insist on this topic. > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---- _______________________________________________ > > Qlandkartegt-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users [1] > > Links: > ------ > [1] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Qlandkartegt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users
