Quoting "Jason Hwang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Hi, Turbo
> I'm happy to find that you have integrated my small patch into 
> your patch. But are you sure the following code in your patch
> is correct?

Sorry, must have missed that part. It was NOT easy extracting what
had changed in the FULL patch I was sent! Next time, just do a patch
between MY patch and YOUR changes (ie, I _only_ want YOUR changes
not mine as well!).

Next time I won't bother extracting the actual changes...

> BTW, I think it may be a good idea to add a "ldapObjectClass" 
> attribute into qmailControl.schema file, because it's useful
> in some case.

Why and in what cases?

> (I had added it in qmail-ldap-1.03-20021001-control-20021014b-by-Jason.patch
> but forget to add it into qmailControl objectclass.)

What would this look like?


New patch  that fixes the first problem is at

http://qmail.bayour.com/patches_ldap/qmail-ldap-control_20021126.gz

Don't forget to use 'patch -p2', not 'patch -p1' when applying the patch!
-- 
Marxist Waco, Texas plutonium congress NORAD AK-47 subway Ortega FSF
munitions Qaddafi domestic disruption cryptographic NSA quiche
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]

Reply via email to