I second that motion. :-)
.~.
/v\
-- // \\
JA /( )\
^`~`^
L I N U X
[-----------------------------------------------------------]
Justin Ainsworth Systems Administrator
PHONE: (530) 879-5660x108 Sunset Net LLC
FAX: (530) 879-5676 1915 Mangrove Ave
WEB: http://www.sunset.net Chico, CA 95926
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[-----------------------------------------------------------]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:26 AM
> To: Turbo Fredriksson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: About latest qmail-control-patch
>
>
>
> Why don't the folks that own qmail-ldap roll in the
> qmail-ldap-control
> patch? It seems logical; many people use both patches, and
> they can be
> enabled or disabled with Makefile defines. That way, qmail-ldap and
> qmail-ldap-control won't be out of sync every month.
>
> The SMTP AUTH patch would also be very handy...
>
> - Jason
>
> On Tuesday, Nov 26, 2002, at 12:57 US/Eastern, Turbo
> Fredriksson wrote:
>
> > Oh, that. 'Not my problem' (ie, can't be bothered to fix it). If
> > people have
> > problem with ONE reject, they will NEVER be happy. I don't
> consider it
> > being
> > such a big deal.
>
>
