Quoting "Gene Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I just want to say that, Jason, your patch is much cleaner than the > original. Turbo, you might want to look at Jason's patch and start with > that one.
In what way? He have everything I have. My patch and his is almost identical today. > On the original patch I always have to go back and manually patch > something because of rejects but on the one Jason was kind enough to > send to all of us, it patches cleanly and without errors. Oh, that. 'Not my problem' (ie, can't be bothered to fix it). If people have problem with ONE reject, they will NEVER be happy. I don't consider it being such a big deal. -- Treasury toluene arrangements Ft. Meade domestic disruption NSA Waco, Texas South Africa Saddam Hussein FSF Clinton plutonium ammonium ammunition Noriega [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
